Website Update

The website has been up for only a few months now.  The bibliographic database is up to 140 entries and growing.  My list has almost 200 articles left to go, not to mention all of the court documents.  

Registration is now open!  Create an account on the site to join in the forums!  More features comming for registered users.  

The forums have been opened.  If you would like to see a forum opened for a specific use, just ask!

Identification issues

State v. Chen, 27 A. 3d 930 - NJ: Supreme Court 2011

"...Consistent with the courts' gatekeeping function, the Appellate Division concluded that "trial courts should grant a request for a preliminary hearing when the reliability of the State's identification evidence is called into question by evidence of highly suggestive words or conduct by private actors that pose a significant risk of misidentification." Id. at 82, 952 A.2d 1094."

Admissibility of Repressed Memories

Rule 403

In Clark v. Edison, 881 F. Supp. 2d 192 - Dist. Court, D. Massachusetts 2012 the court warned that "...the jury might interpret testimony that a person's behavior is "consistent with" that of someone who has repressed memory of a traumatic experience as being testimony that the person actually experienced the phenomenon. All these risks, taken together, demand that a court exercise caution in admitting expert testimony of the kind at issue here..."  

The False Memory Archive: Did that really happen?

K. A. T. E. HILPERN, The False Memory Archive: Did that really happen?, The Independent, 2014.

"I have a strong memory of being a boy in a car driving along a country road in Suffolk," recalls a man who I will call Adam. "Rounding a corner near home, we swerved, narrowly avoiding a milk float. The milk float ended up on its side, covering the road in milk. I can still picture the road, a large oak tree and the milk sloshing about, despite the fact that the boy in the car was my father. I have never lived in Suffolk."


Subscribe to Memory Wars RSS